Stir of Echoes (1999)

Today’s film is the 1999 Stir of Echoes, a loose (and boy is that meaning applied here with a paintbrush) adaptation of the Richard Matheson book of the same name.  I have the Matheson book, and several other Matheson novels, and from what I’ve seen Hollywood just doesn’t know how to adapt the man’s work.  Out of the films/books I’ve read there’s the good (Legend of Hell House which I reviewed awhile back), the decent (What Dreams May Come is a worthy effort), the “great movie but it’s not at all the book” (I Am Legend), and the utter shit (The Box).  Stir of Echoes falls right before The Box but WELL below anything resembling a good movie.  The only way I could recommend this is if you did gathered a bunch of friends together and just bashed it.  In rereading my notes I had a lot of exclamation and question marks and I started yelling aloud to the television.  Here’s why:

Tom Witzky (Kevin Bacon) is a family man with a beautiful wife and young son.  When his wife’s psychic sister Lisa (Illeana Douglas) hypnotizes him and leaves a post-hynoptic suggestion to “open his mind,” Tom awakens with horrific visions of a young woman beckoning him to help her.  As Tom digs deeper into who the girl is, he discovers his son Jake (Zachary David Cope) is also psychic.

The opening scenes of the film provide the only horror you’ll see throughout the entire hour and 45 minutes.  We meet little Jake as he’s talking to someone who we can’t see.  As he gets out of the tub he looks directly at the camera (aka the unseen person) and says “does it hurt to be dead?”  I was thisclose to peeing my pants and thought “Hey, maybe this will be a good movie.”  How wrong and naive was I.  The problem is all the beats of this movie are established in the film’s opening minutes.  Tom is introduced stating emphatically that he wished he wasn’t so “ordinary.”  Well gee, wonder how the events of the film will take him beyond being ordinary?  Tom even says before being hypnotized “What’s the worst that could happen?”  Seriously!  Seeing as how this wasn’t in the romance section of Blockbuster I’m assuming there’s a LOT that can go wrong.  There’s the creepy little kid who can see dead people.  There’s the bizarre ghost girl pleading for help but can’t be understood.  Come to think of it, this movie is a little too close to the Sixth Sense than I’d like.  Someone call up M. Night because I think David Koepp jacked his story and presented a pissed-on version.

Within the first twenty minutes some type of repressed psychic abilities storyline is being presented and the hypnotized segments are something out of Flatliners.  Bacon starts the film as a cocky non-believer (SHUN THE NON-BELIEVER) rocking some type of accent that blends Boston by way of douchebag.  It’s the same accent he was spouting in Hollow Man…hey that also came out in 1999, must have been a desperate need to pay off a mortgage.

Anyway, Lisa leaves a suggestion while hypnotizing Tom that he will “leave your mind open to everything.”  To the audience we all know that doesn’t mean making Tom more liberal or approving, but opening the door to the underworld.  Again, the audience gets that but Lisa doesn’t.  So when Tom calls her and asks her why she’d leave that type of suggestion she just says “I don’t know, I’ve never done it before!”  That’s up there with letting Frenchie from Grease dye your hair!  You’ve never done it before so you figured it’d be fun to experiment on your sister’s husband and you’re shocked to discover he’s seeing shit!  The truly idiotic statements of the cast doesn’t stop there.  Oh now, it doesn’t stop there.

We next meet Paris Geller Debbie (Liza Weil) who babysits for Jake.  Jake starts telling Debbie about how he talks to an unseen girl named Samantha (Jennifer Morrison), who happens to be Debbie’s sister that everyone thinks ran away.  Debbie starts to get upset and starts interrogating Jake (the kid’s all of about 7), including grabbing him abusively.  She then thinks it’s a great idea to abduct him in the dead of night and run off with him as he screams to be let go.  She’s walking through the streets and no one sees this?  She takes him to a train station where her mother works and when Tom and his wife Maggie (Kathryn Erbe) find them Debbie  gets pissed at the parents because she thinks they know something about her sister.  Girl, you’ve kidnapped your charge in the middle of the night.  I understand you want answers but you couldn’t have waited or better yet…made a damn phone call from their house!

After that altercation we never see Debbie again but we know Samantha is our ghost girl haunting Tom.  When the family gets home little Jake starts talking in a demonic voice.  You know that Exorcist, deep-throated voice that no 7-year-old should start talking in or else you’re trying to find the 666 tattooed on his ass.  Reasonably enough Tom starts freaking out and asking Jake to recreate the voice.  That brings me to annoyance #464 of this movie.  The relationships and arguments are all entirely one-sided.  Tom starts yelling at Jake and Maggie starts telling Tom he’s nuts and he needs to calm down (mind you the kid was talking like Satan…I think calming down is the last thing he should do).  Another argument happens where Maggie says Tom is getting scary and he says she’s crazy.  For once, I’d love a horror movie where the couple actually agrees that shit is fucked up.

We run into Lisa again who tells Maggie that she needs to figure out what’s wrong with Tom or else they’re….going to get a divorce?  I love that Lisa tells Maggie to find out “why this is happening. ” It’s happening because you opened up his mind to the underworld you dumbass!  You’re the one to blame!  Yet, no one ever says “hmmm Lisa did this.”  Nope, Maggie goes around totally blame free of her stupid sister.  It’s eventually revealed…as I mentioned above…that Tom has repressed psychic abilities and is told to dig by the ghost girl.  He starts digging in his backyard and when Maggie intervenes Tom rips into a speech taken directly from The Shining.  You know that scene in The Shining where Jack (Jack Nicholson) tells Wendy (Shelley Duvall) that he’s working.  Well Tom’s speech is pretty much that scene so here it is:

We’re getting close to the end of the film and there’s no ghost girl, so what the hell are we focused on?  The ineffectiveness of the scares is what’s sad.  There’s a great scary opening and nothing.  There’s dream sequences that are meant to confuse the audience.  Case in point, Tom goes to visit his neighbor and watches the neighbor’s son kill himself.  They’re ineffective because it’s such an over-the-top moment that we all know “it has to be a dream.”  As for the ghost girl she’s not malevolent or scary so there’s no reason to fear her.  The only “malevolent” thing she does is switch Jake’s cartoons to Night of the Living Dead and as a seven-year-old I’d be totally cool with that.  She’s only haunting Tom and even then….it’s not really that bad except for a few nightmares and the inability to screw his wife.  If anything Tom becomes a total asshole after getting his psychic powers (much like his turn in Hollow Man where we discovered that invisibility automatically makes you a rapist).  Amongst all this the question remains, what is this “stir of echoes” that the title mentions?  There’s no echoes, there’s nothing stirring…must be a book thing.

Tom eventually starts drilling through his house while screaming maniacally.  Now the camera cuts to the street where we see a lot of neighbors listening and hearing this screaming and drilling (REMEMBER THIS FOR LATER), and the only comment someone makes is “It’s a rented house.”  Um, someone could be slaughtered right now….it’d be better if the house was mortgaged?

The big reveal comes when Tom discovers Samantha’s body in the wall.  Raise your hand if you DIDN’T expect a body in the wall?  The movie flashes back to show that Samantha was mentally challenged and was lured into Tom’s house by two neighbor boys (both of whom have fathers who are Tom’s friend and landlord respectively) who attempt to rape and then kill her.  The poor girl is mentally challenged…so her mother’s logical explanation back at the train station was that she ran away?  To go back to my earlier point, we see the neighbors all hear Tom’s shouting and drilling yet NO ONE is out and about when Samantha is screaming?

After watching that wonderful scene of two boys attempting to rape and kill a handicapped girl (can you tell that pisses me off that this is a major plot point) Tom goes to confront one of the boys father’s, his friend Frank (Kevin Dunn).  Frank says he knew of the murder but didn’t want the boys’ lives ruined “because of her.”  I understand wanting to protect your child and defending them, but they tried to rape, and in cold blood, murdered a mentally challenged girl!  I really don’t think you can try to justify that with “well they had such bright futures.”  The other father, Tom’s landlord Harry (Conor O’Farrell) shows up intent on killing Tom to silence him.  I love movies where they assume just killing the one person who knows wantonly is going to solve everything.  Especially when you walk in with no protection so they’ll be easily able to trace the murder back to you.  And when Maggie shows up Harry just decides to kill her too!  Gotta love the ability for anyone to become a multiple murderer in the blink of a plot point.  But off course Harry is foiled by Frank (who we assumed killed himself…guess he just arbitrarily wanted to spend the last ten minutes with the corpse) who kills Harry.  Frank’s final words are “Cold blood murder.  Can’t let that happen here.”  Wait, what?  Are you talking about Harry’s attempts to kill Tom….your son’s murder of Samantha…or you just murdering two people?  That’s how we’re going to end everything?!

Oh well the movie doesn’t end there.  Samantha’s soul is at peace, Tom and Jake love being psychic and everyone lives happily ever after.  Stir of Echoes is crap!  The acting is mediocre, there’s no scares, and the story is just stupid and gross.  The film is supposedly nothing like the book if Wikipedia has anything to say about it.  There’s far better psychic movies out there.  Just don’t see this!  Happy Easter everybody!

Grade: D

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Hopefully you guys all noticed the bright shiny poll on the sidebar.  Please vote to let me know what type of tournament you’d like to see on the blog.  Also thank you to Film-Classics ( who have listed me as an affiliate so my posts will be updated on their site.  Hopefully you guys are all digging the new review format.  I have a few pre-written reviews I’d like to get rid of so I’ll be putting those up during the week.

11 thoughts on “Stir of Echoes (1999)

  1. That was very amusing. I remember seeing the trailer to this all the time with its Paint It Black theme song. It was as annoying then as the trailer for Contraband is now. I did not see this or Hollow Man, but I’m sure your review here offers more entertainment value than either of them. Great job!

    • Thanks, I’m trying to go more in-depth and the great thing about movies like this is they lend themselves so well to being mocked. I do own Hollow Man, I can’t lie, and it’s one of those “so bad it’s good” movies that has no clue what science is. It’s worth a watch if you have Netflix Watch Instantly.

  2. Hmm, I haven’t seen this since it came out, and yes, it is similar to The Sixth Sense (so is The Eye (the original naturally)) which I love, but I liked it a reasonable amount. Admittedly I don’t have any background with the novels. I happen to have loved What Dreams May Come…though again haven’t seen it since it came out.

    • I definitely need to read What Dreams May Come and rewatch the movie (it’s been about six years since I’ve seen it). It seems that after The Sixth Sense, much like Blair Witch, movies with similar stories came out en masse.

  3. Pingback: The 2012 Golden Katz Awards- Vote Now | The Cinematic Katzenjammer

  4. Dude…Stir of Echoes is an awesome movie!! I don’t get the hate whatsoever! I’m all for different opinions but to me it sounds like you wanted to actively hate on this movie because it was based on a book and it wasn’t “faithful”. Show me a movie that’s faithful (and I mean 100% faithful) to the book.

    • I actually haven’t read the novel, I went off what I’d read via Wiki and IMDB, so I can’t comment towards the faithfulness or not. I will admit I was planning on writing this as a “hate” review. I do love a bad Kevin Bacon film, but this is not one of my favorites.

      • So you mean to say you write a review and bash a movie based on what you read on Wiki and IMDB. That is not right. If you are going to review a movie based it on your own experience. By the way, I love this movie and if you watch it again you would found out there are really some funny lines. I read the book and it may not be “faithful” to the book but it was still a great movie. Oh and this movie is more original than Sixth Sense I wouldn’t be surprise of Shyamalan actually read the book before making Sixth Sense. With that being said I also love Sixth Sense.

      • Actually, I mentioned Wikipedia whilst trying to see whether the book was similar to the movie. I didn’t actually read the reviews posted on Wikipedia, before watching this movie; nor did I use IMDB. I do always go into a movie as blind as I can (I generally read plot synopsis, but don’t read reviews till after). I did base everything on my own experience. The Wiki comment actually comes at the end and never influenced my opinion. I would say this movie is hilarious, but I doubt that’s the movie’s intention. It’s meant to be a horror movie, and I gauged it as such and thus it failed. I will say, I didn’t read the book before watching this movie, nor have I read it now. Again, my comments about the book were general and just mentioning that there was supposedly little connection (which isn’t surprising considering this is Hollywood). It wouldn’t surprise me either if Shyamalan borrowed from Matheson’s original text. (He did “borrow” from an episode of Are You Afraid of the Dark for The Sixth Sense, after all.) Sadly, in comparing this to the rest of Kevin Bacon’s 1990s output, it’s a failure in horror movie terms. Thanks for reading and stopping by, hopefully I haven’t put you off future visits.

  5. Dude…Stir of Echoes is an awesome movie!! I don’t get the hate whatsoever! I’m all for different opinions but to me it sounds like you wanted to actively hate on this movie because it was based on a book and it wasn’t “faithful”. Show me a movie that’s faithful (and I mean 100% faithful) to the book.

  6. Pingback: The First Annual Golden Katz Awards- Results | The Cinematic Katzenjammer

Question, Comment? Leave It Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s