16 comments on “Summer Under the Stars: Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967)

  1. I think watching this film alongside the 1960s documentary A Time For Burning would be a great civil rights double feature that echoes heavily with gay rights in the present. Deja vu all over again is the saying, I believe. I do think that instead of making the remake they did, if they had done a gay marriage remake, it might have had more potential.

    • Ooh I’ve never heard of that but it’s definitely added to my Netflix queue! My thoughts exactly, I didn’t see the remake of Guess Who’s and while it was made before the gay rights movement had really hit it stride (it was a year or two early) I think it could easily be redone now with a new couple (although I’m always wary of remakes).

  2. Pingback: Day 17: Katharine Hepburn | Sittin' on a Backyard Fence

  3. Nice review! Like Hepburn, I find this film difficult to watch because when Tracy is giving his big speech and he turns to Hepburn and that chin of hers trembles, my heart breaks into a million pieces! But I would agree that this is one of Poitier’s best performances. So pleased he made in on SUTS this year! I wrote a post about him a few das ago – he’s one of my favorites!
    http://thegreatkh.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/our-miss-fantastic-on-tcm-this-friday.html

  4. What a great post! I have a dear friend who grew up in Puerto Rico and consequently didn’t see this movie as often as I did growing up. We saw Philadelphia together and his complaint about Tom Hanks’ role is that it was “too perfect,” and that the only thing “wrong” with the man is his AIDS. I referenced GWCTD for him. I completely agree about Katherine Houghton. I’m not surprised that she didn’t go on to a stellar film career (though she did have small parts in 5 or 6 more films). And I’m so glad you mentioned that last speech. I think Hepburn’s greatest moments in this film were those wordless ones, listening to Spence.

    • Exactly! I have similar sentiments about Philadelphia and took a film class where we discussed the various flaws with it (including the complete lack of affection between Hanks and Banderas’ characters). Houghton was cute but that seems to be all she had, other than name recognition and yes, I forgot to mention how Hepburn achieves such greatness with few words! Thanks for reading!

  5. Pingback: 2012 tcm SUTS Blogathon Day 17: Katharine Hepburn « ScribeHard On Film

  6. Thanks for the write-up. I can’t wait to see this tonight and I’m so glad that TCM has put it at the 8pm prime-time slot. Agree with what you had to say about Sidney Poitier, who’s magnificent in almost everything he’s in…and here, there’s absolutely no reason to dislike him unless it’s for the color of his skin. Hopefully I’ll be watching and tweeting tonight…hope you’re there, too!

  7. Fun read on a great film. This one never ceases to get to me due to Spencer Tracy’s heartfelt monologue. He is fabulous in this film and I agree, it’s an Oscar-nod-worthy performance. When Hepburn is looking at him with tears in her eyes – although one can clearly see there’s little acting happening at that moment. All misty right now just thinking about it.

    Aurora

  8. As I watched it last night and each time I do, it’s Tracy’s speech at the end that reduces me to tears. That moment in the entire film belongs to him and Hepburn and knowing how soon he passes after filming makes it more heartwrenching. It is a powerful movie that explores so much. Poitier’s performance is incredible and isn’t he just adorable there?! Great post, Kristen!

  9. Pingback: The Month in Film: August 2012 | Journeys in Classic Film

Question, Comment? Leave It Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s