Skip to content
Advertisements

Little Shop of Horrors (1960)

Cultural influence of Gilbert and Sullivan

Cult classics are hard to review, especially if you expected one thing and totally got another.  I have vague recollections of seeing the 1986 musical version of Little Shop of Horrors, and I don’t recall enjoying it.  I’ve heard great things about the 1960, Roger Corman original, and figured it’d be worth a shot.  It’s a film that has its moments of humor, and a unique story, but I just found it odd.  I know that’s not a particularly original thing to say about a cult film, but I never knew what to make of the story of a loveable klutz and his man-eating planet.

Seymour (Jonathan Haze) is about to be fired from his position at a flower shop.  The only way to keep his job is to make a small, cross-breeded plant grow.  The plant, named Audrey Junior after Seymour’s lady-love, does grow but has a problem: it needs human flesh to survive.  As Seymour starts to murder people Audrey Junior’s appetite starts to increase.

A scene from The Little Shop of Horrors.
Bet you didn’t know Jack Nicholson was in this?

I think the most succinct way to write this review is: I like the movie, I think.  I’ve seen a few Roger Corman movies, including The Masque of the Red Death which I reviewed here awhile back, and I liked them but they didn’t seem to be anything special.  Little Shop of Horrors is shot like something that would play on Mystery Science Theater 3000.  The closest thing I can compare it to is the 1930s film Reefer Madness in its appearance and execution.  While Little Shop is espousing the message that Reefer Madness was, in terms of acting quality and all that’s how it appears.  Now I’m sure someone will comment “that’s all intentional” so I’m not saying it’s a complaint.  I’m saying that the film plays like a low-budget B-movie or a cheesy 1960s television show with a few main sets and the characters merely waiting around for something to happen.  A few time the characters all seem to be waiting for Seymour and then start acting on cue.

A scene from The Little Shop of Horrors.
Audrey Junior: “FEED ME!”

The movie does have a fair bit of humor, especially in the SFX work and the sound of the plant.  Audrey Junior starts off simply smacking its lips and that’s incredibly funny because of how unexpected it is.  The flower shop owner Mr. Mushnick (Mel Welles) calls it a “cold sore on the lips” in terms of its appearance.  It’s this mix of macabre SFX and quirky dialogue that makes the movie come off more intentionally bad than you expect.  When Audrey Junior starts talking (the infamous “Feed me”) it’s scary because you don’t expect this big booming male voice to come out of nowhere, but it’s also hysterical BECAUSE it’s a big booming male voice coming from this tiny plant.

Profile image of actor Jonathan Haze, in the p...
Seymour, our loveable buffoon

The characters are all buffoonish in their acting.  Jonathan Haze is very shy and loveable as Seymour.  The female Audrey (Jackie Joseph) is bland and lifeless, merely loving Seymour and doing nothing else.  The two have a chemistry that relies on both of them being kind of dumb.  Case in point is when Seymour and Audrey go on their first date.  Seymour says “You want me to take your sweater?”  He then takes Audrey’s sweater and throws it in a corner.   Mel Welles is great as Mr. Mushnick and the two cops are obviously riffs on Dragnet characters.  Even Jack Nicholson (who I didn’t recognize at first) is oddly funny as the pain-loving Wilbur Force.

Returning to the idea of Reefer Madness, the trajectory of the plot is much like that cautionary tale.  Seymour wants to impress his friends by growing Audrey Junior, but it comes at the expense of Seymour’s soul.  Eventually at the end Seymour pays the ultimate price.

I don’t know what I really expected from Little Shop of Horrors.  I think this is a film that I’ll need to revisit in a few months and really see if it soaks in the second time around.  That’s the problem with cult films, if you’re not in the right mindset you end up not understanding their joy.  Judge for yourself: the entire movie can be watched here

Grade: C+ (that could be revised).

Just another shout out that the Loretta Young book giveaway is STILL going on and there’s only one entry.  Please enter if you’d like to win a copy of Hollywood Madonna – Loretta Young.  Just email kristen@cc2konline.com with your name and address (or just name for now) with the subject Loretta Young Giveaway and you’re entered.  The contest closes the 19th!

Advertisements

Kristen Lopez View All

A freelance film critic whose work fuels the Rotten Tomatoes meter. I've been published on The Hollywood Reporter, Remezcla, and The Daily Beast. I've been featured in the L.A. Times. I currently run two podcasts, Citizen Dame and Ticklish Business.

8 thoughts on “Little Shop of Horrors (1960) Leave a comment

  1. I just watched this last week and really enjoyed it. Not a *great* movie by any means, but a fun one with a pretty ridiculous concept. Plus it was fun to see a VERY early Jack Nicholson role.

  2. Nice review. There really isn’t anything special about the original. It passed the time for me, and, if I remember correctly it was only an hour and fifteen minutes. I would very much like to see you review the musical remake from 1986. I would think if you enjoyed Labyrinth and if you like some of Tim Burton’s movies then you’d have some fun watching it. Hey, it’s directed by the same guy who did The Dark Crystal!

  3. Pingback: Little Shop of Horrors (1960) | Journeys in Classic Film

Question, Comment? Leave It Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: