A Summer Place (1959)

Cover of "A Summer Place"
I’m writing this review later in the day for several reasons: 1) I watched the movie late at night and didn’t have the energy to churn out a decent review, and 2) I struggled to figure out the best way to convey my disdain for this film.  I picked A Summer Place for my entry into the Children in Film blogathon (all of the contributions can be found here) because it I had originally put this on my TCM Top Twelve last June, and I wanted to cover more of the work of troubled teen star Sandra Dee; I bet on the wrong film!  A Summer Place desperately wants to be a Douglas Sirk film (and for a while I believed Sirk was behind it), but it doesn’t have the panache or the inherent camp quality that Sirk did.  While this may have been hot stuff back in the early 60s, it’s tired, weird, and downright unlikeable.  Each character’s worst traits are painted liberally onto their character, and at times I wasn’t sure if the “heroes” were true, or simply the least hateful people.  So, get a coffee and put on the schmaltzy earworm from Hell known at the “Theme From A Summer Place” (Google it and you’ll instantly recognize it) and let’s explore this late 50s stinker!

Self-made businessman Ken Jorgensen (Richard Egan) returns to the small, coastal town of Pine Island with his frigid wife, Helen (Constance Ford) and sweet daughter Molly (Sandra Dee).  Ken also hopes to see the girl the got away: Sylvia Hunter (Dorothy McGuire), who has married drunken lout Bart (Arthur Kennedy).  As Ken and Sylvia get closer together, their children, including Sylvia’s son Johnny (Troy Donahue) are bristling to explore their burgeoning sexuality.

Director and screenwriter Delmar Daves had a prolific career, both behind the camera and on the page.  In running over his filmography he’s crafted one of the foremost romance films, An Affair to Remember (which he wrote), and one of the lesser Bogie/Bacall dramas, Dark Passage (director/screenwriter).  He’s certainly diverse, but here he hopes to create a paragon to Douglas Sirk without any of the technique.  Sirk was able to utilize melodrama to create layered narratives; he used irony, parody, and interesting camera angles to give the audience his true intentions while having the characters appear tirelessly corny.  While it might have been revolutionary – and the frank discussion of teenage sexuality are appropriately adult, when talked about by adults – here there’s too many elements that feel dirty.

The movie’s claim to fame is in the discussion of sexuality, which starts out well.  Ken and Helen live a sexless life, for reasons that are unknown outside of Helen screaming that sex is dirty and something that must be “endured.”  Because we’re meant to see Helen as a villain, you don’t need any further characterization.  Instead of wasting time having Ken and Sylvia discuss the merits of an affair, and how it could ruin lives, they simply say “Okay, let’s do this thing!” (Okay, they might have said it in a more eloquently).  The parents affair is intriguing because it’s acted and scripted with an eye on reality.  Helen finds out about the affair easily, and during a ludicrous conversation with her mother, decides to find a way to catch them.  Unfortunately, that’s dropped when the couple admits it.  However, the fallout feels very real, right down to Arthur calling Sylvia a slut!  Nice to know in 1959 there was no shame in calling a woman that word!  The problem is that once the affair is revealed, the plot meanders in discussing how everyone and the family dog knew Ken and Sylvia would get together, right down to Arthur telling Sylvia how he should have realized something was amiss when she called for Ken during the birth of their son…and you figured you’d be together forever?  If you can’t tell, the dialogue is meant to be sudsy, but comes off laughably ridiculous; no one talks like these characters do, forsaking eloquence for frankness.  Some of the discussions that take place are just uncomfortable, wrapped in the guise of showing a strong relationship.  When I reviewed Jane Withers‘ films, I mentioned how she tended to play the makeshift mother and had a strong relationship with her father.  In that case, it wasn’t uncomfortable; it was a relationship I wished I had with my dad.  Here, I got the heebie-jeebies!  I don’t know many girls that would discuss their parents sex lives with said parent, but Molly and her dad have such a great relationship they discuss the Jorgensen parents not having a fruitful sex life!  This is after Molly has admitted to her father that she left a neighbor boy spy on her undressing.  If the point is to make them bond, it comes off as completely unsettling.

When it comes to the teenage relationship the fear is that mistakes will be made; and really there’s no winners when it comes to teenage love in this film.  Helen wants to “desex” Molly, “as though sex were synonymous with dirt.”  Ken’s point is valid; there’s no way to deny these children are going to be sexual, so why act as if sex is so terrible?  Hell, Helen is nothing short of committing child abuse, particularly when she forces Molly to undergo a physical examination after Molly comes home from spending a chaste night on the beach with Johnny.  The problem is that with all this control of the teens, the actual kids are so underwritten that their decision making capabilities are never developed.  Don’t say that you believe these children will make the right decisions, and then create teenage characters who are so dumb they can’t make said decisions.  The adults have strong dialogue discussing sex, but the script treats the teens as little more than walking sex machines creating a contradiction in what these characters are supposed to say overall.

Dee and Donahue are fairly awful in their roles, Donahue in particular.  Dee is hampered by a weak script that’s content to have her say “Johnny” ad nauseum.  At one point I started to believe that by her saying “Johnny” over and over (literally every sentence concludes with it) that she’d get pregnant!  Dee relies on being scared all the time to convey all necessary emotions, and all the parents believe she’s too dumb to say no to sex.  Literally, the majority of conversations about Molly go along the lines of “Well she’ll meet a guy, and she’ll be so in love she won’t say no.”  This isn’t helped by Molly continually being seduced by Johnny and having him respond with how he’s sick of being “good,” by proxy making her feel terrible that she won’t sleep with him.  She seems to be doing a pretty good job of saying no, and yet the script creates a male lover for her that wants to force her into something she doesn’t want!

As for Donahue (I didn’t intentionally mean to quote Grease), he’s a living robot with blonde hair!  I’ve never watched any of his prior work, but I can only assume he was a teen idol based on looks because it certainly isn’t talent.  He has one moment where the intent is to threaten Helen if she hurts Molly, but Donahue’s delivery makes it sound as if he’s asking a question.  He’s flat and lifeless, and certainly not the man who you’d spend the rest of your life with!  And maybe I’m the only one skeeved out by this but step-sibling relationships…creepy or no?

The movie should have stuck to class distinctions and a dose of sexuality, maybe then it wouldn’t have been so unintentionally hilarious.  When Sylvia says to Helen, “You seem to have an infinite capacity to hurt” I believed she was talking to the audience about the movie.  I flat-out hated A Summer Place!  It desperately wants to be as grand as Douglas Sirk and ends up falling to the ground, hard.  The acting is hammy and over-the-top with non-existent motives and characterization.  Oh, and don’t forget the theme song which plays throughout the entire movie, and even when it’s not you’ll hear it; it still haunts me!  I’ll stick to Sandra Dee in Gidget, please!

Ronnie Rating:

1Ronni

Interested in purchasing today’s film?  If you use the handy link below a small portion will be donated to this site!  Thanks!

A Summer Place

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “A Summer Place (1959)

  1. Ouch! I agree it’s pap, but I grew up on this stuff, so maybe I’m immune. All you say is true, but let’s talk Sandy. I have come to admire her more and more as time goes by. She really does have a star quality and there is just that certain something about her that draws you in. As one who never really go over the break-up with Bobby Darin, she will always be, for me, the ultimate American Girl Next Door (who never ever lived next door to anyone!).

    • True, Sandy led a difficult life and yet managed to be a luminous presence and the perfect representative of the girl next door. I just think this role smothered her in the typical girl who couldn’t make any decisions; not a single person trusts her to resist sexual temptation, and yet at the end she’s “Rewarded” with a guy and baby, she certainly could have done better.

  2. Kristen, I completely agree with your review of “A Summer Place”. It really is a stinker. It is such an annoying film.

    Your review, however, was a treat. This made me LOL: “At one point I started to believe that by her saying “Johnny” over and over (literally every sentence concludes with it) that she’d get pregnant! “

    • Haha, glad to make you laugh. I always hate to write negative reviews because A) who wants to waste their time watching crap, but oh boy some films are just great to rip into.

  3. I know it’s corny but I love 1950s trash films like this haha.
    I will say, it helped me alot to read the book by Sloan Wilson. The book explains why Sylvia and Bart are together rather than Sylvia and Ken. It also discusses Helen’s upbringing and why she is how she is and how she and Ken even got together.
    The book also doesn’t make it seem honky-doory and like Molly is really excited to have this illegitimate child. You actually feel that she resents him for it!
    Great review though! (And can we talk about how Troy always wears red in every film)
    Thanks for participating!

    • Wow, I definitely need to pick up the book. It seems I’ll find all the missing character motivation and history in it. I love 1950s cheese as well (again, I love Gidget), but this was just overbearing lol. Thanks for allowing me to write about a child star I like in a clinker like this.

  4. Pingback: Children in Films Blogathon: The Contributors | Comet Over Hollywood

  5. I agree with you, OMG that film has not aged well. However, it may be worth mentioning that all of this takes place before the birth control pill was commercially available. The consequences of pre-marital sex were different back then.

    • True, birth control was not widely available. I think I would have preferred a more adult approach to the teen relationships. Maybe if Molly had been written to think of the implications of her pregnancy, instead of taking it all with a smile. Thanks for reading!

  6. Delmer Daves seemed to repeatedly attempt to emulate Douglas Sirk – from “A Summer Place” in 1959 to “Youngblood Hawke” in 1964 – and never came close. “A Summer Place” was out at a time when I was occasionally tended to by teenage babysitters. This movie was a big hit among them – after all, it starred two teen idols and featured a steamy plot. When I finally saw it I was surprised that teenage pregnancy was portrayed as somehow romantic. I do have a bit of a junk tooth for the “Theme from a Summer Place,” though. As for Sandra Dee, like you, I’m sticking with her in “Gidget,” my favorite of her films.

  7. Enjoyed your review immensely. I watched A Summer Place last summer, when TCM aired it. My mom was a teen when the movie came out and I remember her telling me that she and all the teens she knew wanted to see it. So from her comment, I decided to dvr it and watch it. From an earlier comment, it sounds as if the book is better. I wondered why Helen was so cold to Ken, and the movie’s plot didn’t explain that at all. What drove Arthur to the bottle? That wasn’t explained either. Yes, I thought the whole step-siblings dating, etc. quite yucky, and Molly and Dad’s discussions-creepy with a capital C! What Dad in his right mind talks about he and the Mom’s failed bedroom relationship with their teenaged daughter???? I don’t mind the song, however, and that might be the only thing I liked about the movie.

    • I’m glad to know I wasn’t overly harsh on this movie. Thank you, their skeezy father/daughter bonding moments were easily the most unsettling moments I’ve watched in a 1950s movie lol, and I thought Gidget had some racy sequences.

  8. I’ll stay away from this film! I don’t think Sandra Dee is very good, specially after hearing Rizzo mocking her screen persona in Grease, but lert’s say I have personal problems with her. The only film I’ve watched with her was 1959’s Imitation of Life and she plays a really nasty character. I’m glad she wasn’t onscreen much time during the film!
    Don’t forget to read my contribution to the blogathon!
    Greetings!
    Le

  9. I have to admit, I associate this movie entirely with the movie DINER (it’s the movie that’s playing during the infamous popcorn scene), so it took me a while for me to give it a chance, and like you, I was not a fan. The one redeemable part of the movie, for me, was Arthur Kennedy as Troy Donahue’s father (as well as cuckolded husband); he gave a natural, believable performance that undercut all the ridiculousness. Anyway, this was a nice write-up, even if you had to suffer through a bad film to get there!

  10. Pingback: The Month in Film: May 2013 |

  11. Pingback: The 20 Worst Reviewed Films of 2013 |

Question, Comment? Leave It Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s